Friday, 5 March 2010

This Week’s Highlights in Misogyny News

Thank you so much to this hilarious episode of 'The White Hot Top Five' for inspiring this post.

This week there seems to have een a worrying influx of sexism stories in the media. Here are just a few of the most ridiculous ones.

So, the Winter Olympics are over for this year. Vancouver put on a great show, and the sport was exciting – I watched just about everything from ski cross to figure skating to ice hockey to the half pipe. But one sport I didn't get to see this Olympics was the women's ski jumping. And why'’s that? Well, even though men's ski jumping has been an Olympic sport since the winter Olympics began in 1924, women's ski jumping is still not an Olympic sport. And it's not that women don’t have an interest in it: it is a woman (Lindsay Van), in fact, who holds the world record for the event. Ski jumping events in which women can compete are held all over the world – there was one at the same venue used in the Olympics just a few weeks before the event – but for some (unknown – Olympic officials have offered no logic for this) reason, it is not an Olympic sport.
Not that it's all that great for the women who can compete in sports. As I was saying in a conversation with J, sexism is rife in sports, with the women’s events often seen as a less important 'version' of the main, men's event. As a report in Sports Illustrated says:

"Sexism isn't confined to any sport or country. It's a universal language, spoken not so much with words as with action, or the lack of it. Female hockey players from many of the European countries competing in the Olympics, for instance, have seen their national federations' lopsided spending on the men's programs as a loud and clear message that they are considered mere afterthoughts. In Russia, where hockey is the national pastime, the women couldn't begin practicing until three weeks before the Games because of budget constraints."

Something’s got to change. To see more on this story, check out this article over at Feministing.com.

OK, so if you can’t watch the sport without being confronted with blatant sexism, what can you watch? How about a film? Robert Pattinson has been all over the media this week promoting his new film ‘Remember Me’. But what got the most attention was an interview with him in ‘Details’ magazine, in which he said:

"I really hate vaginas. I’m allergic to vagina."

And this interview was accompanied by him surrounded by pictures of pornified naked women. Seriously.
But seriously, Pattinson just proves a major misogynistic phenomenon that feminists from Germaine Greer to Jessica Valenti have been going on about since (it seems) time began: that men hate women’s biology. In Full Frontal Feminism, Valenti points out that the worst thing you can call someone is a woman: cunt, bitch, pussy, slut, etc. A man is not naturally any of these things – the word has to be altered to fit: thus 'whore' becomes 'manwhore' – masculine adjusted lexis from a supposedly feminine norm.
So Pattinson, you are not 'allergic' to vagina, as you so charmingly put it. You are just an extremely misogynistic man. If you actually hated vaginas, you wouldn’t be straight. But then, gay / asexual guys don’t make sex-gods that 87% of women want to marry. Ugh.

So there's nothing to watch that’s not saturated with sexism. Why not listen to some music? But - le gasp! - it’s a trap! Music’s just as fucked up as the rest of pop culture. And a prime example of this is my favouritest person ever, Ke$ha. Words fail to describe what I feel about this latest pop music mistake. Could there be a worse role model for women in the music industry? I think not.
Witness Exhibit A:

"I have very empowering lyrics for women."

HAHAHAHA... this is some kind of joke, right? Oh no, wait, there’s more? Do carry on...

"I kind of take how guys talk to women all over this industry and throw it back at them."

OK, so you take your inspiration from charming lyrics like 'you were supposed to love me, now bleed bitch bleed', 'I'ma own that pussy' and 'make sure it's not your bloody week, you slut'. And that’s empowering to whom, exactly?

"I'm literally just talking to a man the way any rapper talks about women in
every rap song on the radio."

Oh I see. That makes total sense!
Wtf, Ke$ha, did no one ever tell you that two wrongs don’t make a right? Sexist comments like that, whoever they are addressed to, are not empowering to anyone. They’re just sick and demeaning. Not to mention that your use of this 'tactic' fails anyway because it’s completely misguided.
Let’s take a look at Exhibit B, shall we? These are some of the lyrics to your latest single, 'Blah Blah Blah':

'Boy come on give me rock stuff
Come put a little love in my glove box'

You know, I’m all for women gaining sexual empowerment. And people like Lady Gaga are actually making a point in their lyrically sexual songs (I’m thinking 'Bad Romance' where some pimp-ring guy gets fried by Gaga’s flamethrower bra). But lyrics like that don’t work if you’re singing them whilst posing provocatively, flicking your hair and smiling seductively at this random guy that hanging creepily over you – the same guy who you claim to be a complete douchebag. You see, Ke$ha, you’ve got this strong and sexual woman thing all wrong. It’s OK to be sexually forward towards a guy you actually like, but that doesn’t mean you should throw yourself at any random creep that wants to sleep with you. Instead of empowering women, your lyrics actually portray women who choose to promote and condone demeaning, misogynistic attitudes. Way to go!

Phew, what a week!
And that's just the latest addition to centuries of sexism.

6 comments:

  1. Greetings Darling,

    What a fabulous article. It's really good to read this in light of the various conversations we've been having this week about sexism in Sport and in general.

    The ski-jumping thing is just ridiculous. How can they even get away with it? This has got to change... let's hope that by the time the next Winter Olympics come round, things will be different!

    Ugh. How horrible can Robert Pattinson get? I thought being in 'Twilight' was bad enough... Genitalia are not generally the most beautiful things in the world -- I hate penises, for example! -- and who doesn't get a little creeped out at the thought? But that's totally different from being sexist and proclaiming an "allergy to vaginas." He's not exactly going to break out in a rash when he has sex, is he? Tsssk. Thanks for mentioning Jessica Valenti's comments on how the worse thing you can call a guy is a woman: it's so true, and it's this kind of shit that messes up both guys and girls!!! D:

    Eurgh, Ke$ha! I haven't actually listened to her lyrics -- I've just stood in hip-hop with Rach moaning at the crapness of her music -- but I'm not surprised that she's said those things. There's a fine line between sexual empowerment and sexism, and she clearly doesn't know where it is. Win for Lady Gaga, though!

    Sorry to ramble :)

    Love you,

    J xxx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I really felt the need to get something angry written down after those convos.

    I hope so too! There is simply no reason for it. It really pisses me off that they think they can get away with it!

    It's just the terrible hypocrisy of his comments when they're alongside a load of photos of him being draped with naked women! If he really 'hated' vaginas, why did he allow himself to be surrounded with a load of pornified, objectified women - who, if they weren't already demeaned enough by the photoshoot, are again demeaned in his comments about them! ARGH.

    I've been trying not to, but I got pretty concerned when my 11 year old sister bought her album. I'm just glad that someone like Sergio pointed it out! :D
    Win for Lady Gaga indeed. The more I think about her, the more awesome I think she is.

    I love long comments! Do not apologise for your winnery! D<

    Love you too
    xxx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Urgh, why would Pattinson even say that? It's something that didn't need saying and that he should have kept to himself, even if it was true. This lowers my already low opinion of him.

    As for Ke$ha, if she wants to empower women then why the hell does she wear the kind of skimpy outfits that just serve to objectify women? Not to mention the lyrics. Proclaiming to be a feminist(which she obviously thinks she is) but giving completely the wrong message just makes people think that all feminists are men-haters and no better than mysogynists.

    Hmm, your blog posts are actually about things that need talking about and are worth talking about. I should take a leaf out of your book. Saying that, no doubt my next post will be on the pros and cons of blue crayons, or something equally pointless...

    xxx

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know! He's such a pathetic misogynistic attention-seeker... D<

    Well, you see, Ke$ha doesn't think rationally like that. Here's another quote from the same interview:

    'For me, it’s not super-important to wear, like, high heels and push up bra, and be like a girly girl. To me it’s more important to be, like, in something comfortable so if I don’t come home for a few days, I can kick it ... The one thing people can take away from it is that you can look cool and feel confident without having to look like a slut, and without having to spend a lot of money.'

    I actually fell off my chair laughing when I read that! xD

    Her stance on feminism doesn't even make sense. She says stuff that's man-hating, but at the same time seems to be encouraging every man out there to stick his dick in her! She is a very confused woman...

    But your posts are lovely and refreshing after all the feminist rantings of my blogs! And blue crayons can be very controversial! D:

    xxx

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ha, if she doesn't look like a slut then I've got no idea what a slut looks like... This outfit looks particularly comfortable and non-slutty, particularly the suspenders *rolls eyes* Now I too feel empowered to wear less! Yay!

    Lol, if refreshing means pointless then perhaps! I lie awake at night thinking about blue crayons, literally.

    (We've gotten into that common phenomenon of having two conversations at the same time :P)

    xxx

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, I mean, I always wear extremely skimpy tops - I mean, dresses - leopard-print suspenders, and twenty tons of (very cheap looking) jewellery! And it doesn't take any time at all to douse half my face in glitter!

    In this case, less is definitely NOT more!

    Really? Literally!? That's actually slightly worrying... xD

    (Indeed we have. Happens all the time!)

    xxx

    ReplyDelete